Jerusalem Post'tan Hamas Al-Jazzera bağlantısıyla ilgili bir haber

 

Al-Jazeera'nın Hamas'ın 7 Ekim saldırılarındaki yanıltıcı propaganda işbirlikleri;

Inside Hamas’ propaganda machine: How Al Jazeera aided October 7 misinformation

Documents reveal Hamas' coordinated effort with Al Jazeera to reshape the narrative of the October 7 attack.

Israel has obtained a series of internal documents exchanged between Hamas operatives in Gaza and producers at the Qatari news network Al Jazeera. The documents reveal Hamas' attempt to alter its narrative surrounding the October 7 attack and the mass killings committed by its terrorists against Israeli civilians.

A report published by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, part of the Intelligence Heritage and Commemoration Center, presents some of the materials seized by the IDF, the Shin Bet, and the IDF Intelligence Directorate. These documents expose direct communication between senior Hamas officials in Gaza and Al Jazeera producers.

Al Jazeera’s role in Hamas’ narrative warfare

The report assesses that the broadcast of a recent Al Jazeera investigative program aimed to reinforce Hamas' narrative of "victory" following the ceasefire in Gaza and to justify the October 7 attack as a "legitimate military operation." The program also sought to cement the image of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar as a "warrior leader" who remained on the front lines until his death.

“The exclusive footage of Sinwar on the battlefield in Rafah, alongside rare recordings of Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, provides further evidence of the deep ties between Hamas and Al Jazeera,” the report states. It also references previous exposures of Al Jazeera journalists who were found to be members of Hamas' military wing and the network’s privileged access to footage of Israeli hostages being released.

On January 24, 2025, Al Jazeera aired a special episode of its investigative program What Is Hidden Is Greater (ما خفي أعظم), focusing on the October 7 Hamas attack from the perspective of its military wing. The broadcast included new details about the attack’s planning, testimonials from Hamas field commanders and operatives, and unprecedented footage of Mohammed Deif in a command room. It also featured Yahya Sinwar walking through Rafah’s battleground before his reported death in September 2024.

The program echoed Hamas’ false claim that the attack was aimed solely at Israeli military personnel and that the group intended only to capture soldiers while avoiding harm to civilians, particularly children and the elderly. According to the report, Hamas used the broadcast to reinforce its "victory narrative" and legitimize its actions on October 7 as a justified military operation.

The broadcast also emphasized Hamas’ messaging that the attack was a "religious jihad justified by Islam", portraying Palestinian resilience, heroism, and sacrifice as the key to the success of Al-Aqsa Flood—Hamas’ codename for the assault. It further framed the attack as a historic moment where Palestinians refused to surrender to "oppression and aggression" and made immense sacrifices for their faith, homeland, and Al-Aqsa Mosque.

Inside the attack's strategic plan

The program included testimony from senior Hamas operative Mahmoud al-Haddad, who claimed that Hamas’ military leadership convened continuous emergency meetings starting on October 1, 2023, to finalize attack plans and set the timeline. According to al-Haddad, in the 24 hours leading up to the attack, Hamas linked its command centers to the main operations room, deployed attack units, and placed weapons on high alert for the moment of execution.

The broadcast also showcased what was described as the original operation order, allegedly signed by Mohammed Deif on October 5, 2023, detailing precise execution commands and setting "zero hour" at 6:30 AM on October 7, 2023. The primary target, according to al-Haddad, was Israel’s Gaza Division headquarters, with the goal of destroying bases and outposts and neutralizing Israeli security forces along the first defense line near Israeli border communities.

According to the program, Hamas spent years gathering intelligence on Israel’s border defenses, including analyzing the thickness of the security barrier’s concrete, construction methods, and electronic surveillance systems. Hamas also reportedly obtained classified visual intelligence on IDF patrol routes, capturing footage of Israeli officers and soldiers near the border.

One of the segments showcased footage of Colonel Asaf Hamami, commander of the Southern Brigade in the Gaza Division, who was killed on October 7, with his body taken into Gaza. Al-Haddad further claimed that Hamas had obtained a classified document from Israel’s elite intelligence Unit 8200, allegedly through a cyber breach. The document, he said, was analyzed, translated, and integrated into the strategic planning of the attack.

The investigation revealed that Hamas deliberately misled Israel by creating the illusion that it was appeased by economic concessions while secretly finalizing its war preparations. According to al-Haddad, Hamas informed its allies in the "Axis of Resistance" about the general intent of the attack. Still, it kept the exact timing a closely guarded secret, ensuring success through strict operational secrecy.

The program portrayed the "Al-Aqsa Flood" as an overwhelming success with far-reaching consequences beyond Gaza. Al Jazeera amplified Hamas’ "victory narrative," presenting the attack as a humiliating failure for Israel, citing high-level resignations within the Israeli security establishment, internal blame-shifting, and a chaotic intelligence response. Hamas reportedly believes that domestic criticism in Israel will intensify as investigations uncover the full scale of the intelligence and operational failures.

Hamas also sought to glorify Palestinian resilience, claiming that despite Israel’s "brutal revenge campaign" against Gaza’s civilian population, it had failed to crush Palestinian resistance. The report alleges that Hamas views U.S. and Western military support for Israel—including tens of thousands of tons of weaponry—as enabling further Israeli "aggression against people, land, and heritage."

One of the program’s key visual elements was footage of Mohammed Sinwar, portraying him as a hands-on battlefield leader directing combat operations. The report concludes that Al Jazeera played a crucial role in amplifying Hamas' strategic messaging, shaping public perception, and whitewashing Hamas’ war crimes under the guise of investigative journalism.

 

Has anyone actually asked the people of Gaza if they want a two state solution?

Dünya media'sındaki Filistinli mahkumlar

İki yüzlülük devam edyor. Dünya media'sı, son esir takasında,  Israel hapishanelerindeki teröristlerin salınmalarını, Israel şu kadar "Filistinliyi" serbest bıraktı  başlıklarıyla veriyor.  Bu insanları terörist olarak nitelendirmeyerek yeniden ve bir kez daha kelime oyunu oynuyorlar. Kibutzlarda ve Nova festivalinde yapılanlarla, katillerle masum sivilleri, yataklarından zorla, silah zoruyla götürülenleri,  zulmedilenleri,  zavallı insanlarla,  bu elleri kanlı canileri aynı hesaba koyuyorlar.

Avrupa'nın ikiyüzlülüğünün, insafsızlığının, yalancılığının, antisemitizminin sonu gelmedi ve gelmeyecek. Eğer Filistinlilere yaptıkları iğrenç yağcılığın kendilerine   puan getireceğini sanıyorlarsa, bundan onlara  çıkar çıkacağına inanıyorlarsa yanılıyorlar.

Bu haksızlıklar bu doğanın içindeki dengesizliğin dengesinde cevabını bulacak. Çünkü gün gelip radikal anlayış onları yok edecek.

Avrupa ya da Batı sonunun geldiğini göremeyecek kadar kendi zaafları içinde boğuluyor. Yüzyıllardır yarattıkları değerleri yıktıklarının farkında değiller. Çünkü o suyunu çeken liberal akımların son kalan demiyle sarhoşlar hala.

Kendi yapmacık insancıllıklarıyla, göreceli sevgileri ve kurallarıyla onları içten içe kemiren sömürgenlerin ağına düştülerinin farkında bile değiller.

Yahudileri, Israel'i kullanarak hedef almaya devam ederken, Avrupa toplumunu katkılarıyla zenginleştirenlerden nefret ederken onları sevmeyen, onları kabul etmeyen, onları yıkmaya niyet edenlere empatiyla bakıyorlar.

Sanırım bu da onların cezası!!!

 

Boris Johnson on mobs that surrounded hostages: 'How is that supposed to promote reconciliation?'

Jan 19, 2025

Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson commented on a photo showing the released hostages surrounded by mobs of Gazans while being transferred to the Red Cross: "What a picture of Hamas - thousands of armed young men jeering these brave, defenceless and totally innocent women. How is that supposed to promote reconciliation?"

Yemen bu sabah üzerimize yeniden füze attı

Bir sabah daha güne Yemen'den üzerimize atılan balistik füzeyle uyandık.  Ülkenin yarısı sirenlerle ayağa kalktı.

Hutiler, kıçlarında donu olmayan, yiyecek yemekleri olmayan, askerleri terlikli insansılar üzerimize hala füzeler atıyorlar.

BBC en son ne zaman bahsetti bunlardan, ne zaman bizim tarafımızı dile getirdi??

Peki, Le Monde?

Le Figaro?

Arapların dört bir tarafımızından bize nasıl saldırdıklarını ne zaman dile getirdiler?

Hamas'ın elindeki Filistinlilerin zavallılıklarını üzerimize yüklemekten ne zaman yoruldular?

Burada neler geçirdiğimizi, hikayeyi bulandırmadan ne zaman anlattılar?

BIKTIK SİZDEN

Umarım gün gelir aynı füzeler sizin başınızda patlar!!

Gazeteciler böyle şeyler yazmazlar belki, bilirim.

Zaten ben amatör bir yazarım..

Ben duygularımı daha heyecanlı, daha otantik dile getirebilirim..

Evet; AVRUPA'NIN ARTIK YAPTIKLARININ CEZASINI ÖDEMESİNİN ZAMANININ GELDİĞİNE İNANIYORUM.

Yapmacık insancıllıklarından, entellektüel barbarlıklarından, şık giyimlerinin altındaki hayvani iç güdülerinden, bize karşı bitmeyen nefretlerinden sıkıntı geldi!!

Eve dönmek... Boaz Mauda harika sesiyle söylüyor

Pazar günü üç kızımız eve dönüyor

 

Jerusalem Post'tan

 

Blinken’s parting words: No hostage deal? Blame Hamas, not Netanyahu - analysis

Blinken's comments in the interview Saturday were not all that predictable when nearly 20 minutes of the 50-minute conversation turned toward Israel, Hamas, and Gaza.

The way US Secretary of State Antony Blinken began his swan-song interview with The New York Times some three weeks before leaving office was predictable: The Biden administration he served left America better placed around the world than when it came into office.

“Today, as I sit with you, I think we hand over an America in a much, much stronger position, having come through the economic crisis, having come through the health crisis, and having changed much for the better [of] our position around the world because we made those investments in alliances and partnerships,” he said in a message approximating what every secretary of state says when they leave office.

But his comments in the interview Saturday were not all that predictable when nearly 20 minutes of the 50-minute conversation turned toward Israel, Hamas, and Gaza.

Netanyahu not to blame for no hostage deal

Among certain segments of the Israeli public, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the reason the hostages are still languishing in Hamas’s tunnels. If he only really wanted their freedom, they would be released.

Yair Golan, chairman of The Democrats party, gave voice to this sentiment in a KAN Reshet Bet interview Sunday morning. “Israel does not want an agreement; the prime minister of Israel does not want an agreement,” he said. “Netanyahu could have reached an agreement three or four times for sure; he dismissed this, he lies to the press, he leaks reports to Bild. All kinds of shameful tricks and games. He should stand up before the citizens of Israel and say, ‘I don’t want to free the hostages, I have political pressure, I can’t do it.’ He should tell the truth for a change.”

Ah, the truth.

What is Outbrain

In a situation where secret negotiations are ongoing for months, it is difficult to say what the “truth” is.

But Blinken, who has been closely involved in the negotiations, probably has a pretty good idea. And here is what he said when asked by the interviewer whether Netanyahu blocked a ceasefire deal in July that would have led to the hostages’ release.

“No, that’s not accurate,” he said. “What we’ve seen time and again is Hamas not concluding a deal that it should have concluded.”

---

Stay updated with the latest news!

Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter

Subscribe Now

---

Blinken said there have been times, such as when Israel killed Hamas head Yahya Sinwar, that Israeli actions have made getting to a conclusion of a deal more difficult, but unlike Golan, he clearly placed the onus not on Netanyahu but on Hamas.

Daylight between Israel and the US is not good

In a meeting with Jewish leaders at the beginning of his presidency in 2009, then-US president Barack Obama famously rejected the premise put forward by Malcolm Hoenlein, then the head of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, who had said `for Israel to take risks, its leaders “must know that the United States is right next to them.”

“Look at the past eight years,” Obama reportedly said. “During those eight years, there was no space between us and Israel, and what did we get from that? When there is no daylight, Israel just sits on the sidelines, and that erodes our credibility with the Arab states.”

As if to show the world that daylight, Obama went on a tour of the Mideast a month earlier that brought him to Saudi Arabia and Egypt but not to Israel. You want daylight? That was daylight. In this way, Obama was putting into practice a policy many presidents before him believed as well: The way to get closer to the Arab states is to distance America from Israel.

Blinken, who served at the time as then-vice president Joe Biden’s national security advisor, told the Times that perceived daylight between Israel and the US emboldened Hamas and made the possibility of a hostage deal more distant.

Blinken said there were two main impediments to Hamas reaching an agreement to free the hostages. One impediment, he said, was when there was public daylight between the United States and Israel and the perception that pressure on Israel was growing: “We’ve seen it: Hamas has pulled back from agreeing to a ceasefire and the release of hostages.”

As a result, there were times, Blinken said, that what the US said in private to Israel was not what it said in public so that Hamas would not get the wrong idea. Daylight, he said, means that “the prospects of getting the hostage and ceasefire deal over the finish line become more distant.”

The other main impediment to Hamas making a deal, Blinken said, was their belief and hope that there would be a much wider conflict: “that Hezbollah would attack Israel, that Iran would attack Israel, that other actors would attack Israel, and that Israel would have its hands full, and Hamas could continue what it was doing.”

Even Blinken is frustrated at how the world has lost the thread on Gaza

The Times’ journalist, Lulu Garcia-Navarro, who interviewed Blinken, began the section on Gaza with a perfunctory acknowledgment that Hamas’s October 7 attack led to “horrific results, which we saw.”

Then she said Israel’s response has been “extreme,” quoted as gospel the UN figures of the Palestinian death toll at 45,000 without saying those figures are based on Hamas numbers and do not differentiate between combatants and noncombatants, said the population is starving, all hospitals have been destroyed, the destruction of Gaza has been “fairly indiscriminate,” and wondered whether Blinken worried that perhaps he presided over “what the world will see as ethnic cleansing.”

To his credit, Blinken flatly refuted the ethnic cleansing canard, saying, “It’s not, first of all.”

None of the responsibility for the evil Garcia-Navarro listed did she place at Hamas’s doorstep.

Blinken, again to his credit, flagged this, though not specifically referring to her.

“Look, one of the things that I found a little astounding throughout is that for all of the understandable criticism of the way Israel has conducted itself in Gaza, you hear virtually nothing from anyone since October 7 about Hamas,” he said. “Why there hasn’t been a unanimous chorus around the world for Hamas to put down its weapons, to give up the hostages, to surrender – I don’t know what the answer is to that.

“Israel, on various occasions, has offered safe passage to Hamas’s leadership and fighters out of Gaza. Where is the world? Where is the world saying, Yeah, do that! End this! Stop the suffering of people that you brought on!

“Now, again, that doesn’t absolve Israel of its actions in conducting the war. But I do have to question how it is that we haven’t seen a greater sustained condemnation and pressure on Hamas to stop what it started and to end the suffering of people that it initiated.”

And what was Garcia-Navarro’s very next question? Asking for a response to a State Department employee’s gripe about how the department “frequently rolled over for Israel, that no one would read his reports on civilian casualties.”

An agreement with the Saudis is not dead… but it means a pathway to a Palestinian state

Blinken revealed that he was originally scheduled to go to Saudi Arabia and Israel on October 10 to pursue normalization and “work on the Palestinian component of any normalization agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel.”

“Obviously, that didn’t happen,” he said.

Nevertheless, he added later in the interview, normalization with Saudi Arabia still “can happen tomorrow” based on the work the administration has done and “once there is an end to the conflict in Gaza and an agreement on a credible path forward for the Palestinians.”

According to Blinken, the prospect exists of a totally different region “with normalized relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia and many other countries, Israel integrated into the security architecture of the region, and – because it will be a requirement of any such normalization agreement – a real pathway to a Palestinian state.”

UN reports and Moshe Ya’alon damage Israel abroad

Most Israelis pay little attention to UN reports concerning it or off-the-wall comments by embittered ex-politicians and former generals and prime ministers carrying a bellyful of grievances against Netanyahu.

So when a UN agency says that Israel is committing ethnic cleansing, or former IDF chief of staff and defense minister Moshe Ya’alon makes outlandish claims of ethnic cleansing and war crimes, they dismiss them given the context: The UN agencies are implacably anti-Israel, and Ya’alon’s hatred of Netanyahu has clouded his judgment.

But the world doesn’t see things in the same way, and when UN agencies determine that Israel’s actions border on ethnic cleansing, or Ya’alon says Israel is engaged in ethnic cleansing or war crimes, it enters the broader narrative that shapes the conversations.

Blinken did not refer to either the UN or Ya’alon, but his interviewer did, quoting UN figures on the Palestinian death toll, a UN committee report that found Israel’s warfare practices were “consistent with the characteristics of ethnic cleansing,” and Ya’alon’s statement.

The latter, especially, was used as evidence of Israel’s wrongdoing. “This is internal criticism. This is not external. So I guess I would repeat the question and ask you, has Israel respected the rules of war in Gaza?” she asked Blinken.In other words, when a former Israeli defense minister accuses his own country of war crimes, or a UN committee throws around the term ethnic cleansing, it doesn’t stay inside the bubble of local politics – it shapes the way the world sees Israel.These claims, no matter how biased or politically driven, don’t just get brushed aside; they become part of the broader conversation. That, too, came out clearly in this interview.